The diuretic drug spironolactone may be just as effective as antibiotics for the treatment of women’s acne, report researchers from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
The study, published in the Journal of Drugs and Dermatology, found patients who were originally prescribed spironolactone changed to a different drug within one year at almost the same rate as those who were prescribed antibiotics. The prescription change is a proxy for ineffectiveness, since switching is often the result of treatment failure due to lack of efficacy, side effects, cost, or other factors.
Oral antibiotics are the most common systemic treatment for acne, and when combined with the large patient population, the result is that dermatologists prescribe the highest level of antibiotics per provider among all medical specialties, according to the Centers for Disease Control – a fact that contributes to concerns about increased resistance to antibiotics across all fields of medicine.
“It’s clear that a safe alternative to oral antibiotics could have a huge benefit, and our data show spironolactone may be that alternative,” says the study’s lead author John S. Barbieri, MD, MBA, Dermatology chief resident at Penn, in a news release. David J. Margolis, MD, PhD, a professor of Dermatology, was the study’s senior author.
To arrive at their findings, researchers compared data on 6,684 women and girls taking spironolactone to 31,614 who were prescribed antibiotics. Within a year, 14.4 percent of spironolactone patients and 13.4 percent of antibiotic patients had switched to alternative treatments, suggesting each treatment was working at almost the same rate, despite the fact that tetracycline-class antibiotics are prescribed five times as frequently.
“These numbers suggest dermatologists should consider spironolactone first instead of antibiotics when it comes to women with acne,” Barbieri says.
In addition to the benefits for antibiotic stewardship, Barbieri pointed to several studies showing long-term oral antibiotic use may be associated with antibiotic resistance, lupus, inflammatory bowel disease, and even colon and breast cancer.
“This indicates spironolactone may have a better safety profile than oral antibiotics, which is another factor that makes it such an appealing option,” Barbieri says. He also noted spironolactone is less expensive, which may be relevant to patients with high deductibles or who are uninsured.
Spironolactone is not approved for the treatment of acne by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration despite expert opinion supporting its use, and Barbieri says the findings of this study should be confirmed by a randomized controlled trial that directly compares the two treatment options.Next Story