Psoriasis is a chronic dermatologic disease affecting 2.6 percent of the US population.1 It is debilitating both physically and mentally, and there is always a need to develop treatment options with better success rates, not only acutely, but long-term. Despite the wide range of treatment options available, UVB phototherapy remains one of the safest therapeutic modalities for psoriasis.2 The latest development in UVB phototherapy is the excimer laser, a novel therapeutic option where a beam of coherent light with a wavelength of 308nm is transmitted through a handheld articulated arm.3 The device uses a spot diameter of 14 to 30mm, allowing targeted therapy to a small area on the skin and thus the ability to spare healthy skin from exposure to UV radiation. In addition, since psoriatic skin can usually tolerate a higher dose of UVB than unaffected skin can, treatment can be conducted at multiples of the minimal erythema dose (MED). This aggressive “supraerythemogenic” therapy greatly enhances the efficacy of UVB phototherapy and thereby results in fewer required sessions and a lower accumulated dose of UVB.4,5

Although the mechanism of action of targeted phototherapy appears to be similar to that of other modes of UV-based therapy, namely, induction of Tcell apoptosis, suppression of DNA synthesis, and generation of prostaglandins and cytokines, reports have demonstrated that 308nm excimer laser is more effective than NB-UVB.2 Proposed mechanisms for this enhanced efficacy include deeper penetration of the skin and more potent capacity to induce T-cell apoptosis.6,7 Because of this, targeted phototherapy with excimer laser appears to induce longer remission than traditional UVB. This article reviews the efficacy and safety of excimer laser phototherapy and discusses potential uses in both localized and generalized psoriasis.

The use of excimer laser in psoriasis was first documented in 1997 by Bonis, et al., who described the superior effects of excimer over traditional NB-UVB phototherapy in a non-randomized, left to right comparison in six patients.8 They demonstrated that the cumulative dose for complete clearance was 6.47 times less with the excimer laser than with traditional NB-UVB and that the number of treatments needed was 3.6 times less, while the duration of phototherapy was 2.27 times shorter. No p-value was reported. More recent studies by Goldinger, et al. and Kollner, et al. both also suggest at least similar results with excimer laser treatment when compared to traditional NB-UVB.9,10

Subsequently, Asawonda, et al. conducted another 26-week, open-label trial to determine the doseresponse relationship of excimer laser generated irradiation.11 Four plaques in 13 patients received one, two, four, and 20 treatments, respectively. Within each plaque, eight doses based on multiples of MED were tested in distinct sites (0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 16 MED). Overall, treatment with higher fluences (8 and 16 times MED) produced significantly better results than low or medium (6 MED) fluences at weeks 4, 6, 8, and 10 (p<0.05). In addition, at four-month follow-up, all sites that received low or medium fluences had recurrences, whereas those that underwent a single treatment at 8 and 16 MED multiples remained in remission. The authors concluded that with 308nm UVB radiation, it may be possible to clear psoriasis with as little as one treatment, with moderately long remission. However, treatment with higher fluences may be associated with blistering of the psoriasis plaque and hence, dosing must be tailored to the individual patient.11

Since that time, several other trials have focused on the treatment of localized psoriasis using dosimetry based on multiples of the MED (See Table 1). In the largest multicenter, open-label trial of 124 patients by Feldman, et al., 84 percent of patients (95 percent CI, 79-87 percent) achieved 75 percent improvement or better in their target plaques after 10 or fewer treatments and 50 percent of patients (95 percent CI, 35-61 percent) reached an improvement of 90 percent or better after 10 or fewer treatments. 12 Of the patients who met the protocol requirements, 72 percent achieved at least 75 percent improvement in an average of 6.2 treatments. In general, dosing was started at 3 MED and then adjusted as per clinical response. Overall, the 308nm excimer laser appeared to be very effective for psoriasis, requiring fewer patient visits than conventional phototherapy.

In 2003, Taneja, et al. then introduced a new, convenient induration based dosage schedule with the excimer laser.13 They treated plaques twice weekly with an initial dose based solely on the induration component of the modified PASI score for that lesion rather than testing MED and relying on multiples of MED for treatment. Subsequent treatments were twice a week, with dosage increments of up to 50 percent, based on the change in induration. Fourteen patients completed the study with a mean of 10 treatments using a mean cumulative dose of 8.8J/cm2. The treated plaques showed significant improvement from baseline (p<0.001), and the authors were able to demonstrate that selective targeting of laser-generated excimer irradiation with this convenient induration-based dosage schedule allows for individualized treatment plans for each plaque.13 Most laser protocols now use indurationbased dosing rather than MED determination, given its good results and convenience in comparison to calculating multiples of MED.

Excimer laser can also be used in difficult-to-treat areas, such as palms, soles, and scalp. Nistico, et al. evaluated 54 patients with palmoplantar psoriasis in an open label trial treating with excimer laser every seven to 10 days.14 A mean number of 10 sessions was performed. After four months of therapy, complete remission was seen in 31 patients, a partial remission in 13 patients, and a moderate improvement in 10 patients. Greater than 75 percent improvement was seen in 44 patients. Another study by Han, et al. also conducted the treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis with the excimer laser.15 All 15 patients in the study completed a total of 25 treatment sessions. At the completion of the treatment course, a single patient (6.7 percent) achieved clearance, seven patients (46.7 percent) showed marked improvement, and two patients (13.3 percent) failed to respond. This erratic efficacy may be due to the fact that UVB, even given through laser, may still not penetrate deeply enough for some patients with palmoplantar psoriasis.

Morison, et al. tested the use of the excimer laser in 35 patients with scalp psoriasis.16 Patients received twice-weekly treatment using the laser with manual separation of the hair to access the treatment site. All patients improved, with 49 percent of patients cleared with a mean of 21 treatments. An additional 45 percent of patients improved 50-95 percent. Another study by Taylor, et al. evaluated 13 patients with scalp psoriasis unresponsive to topical steroids.17 After 15 weeks of treatment on half the scalp with the excimer laser along with an air-blowing device to move hair out of the way, patients had statistically and clinically significant improvement (p<0.001). A mean decrease in a modified PASI score of 4 was seen on the treated side and a decrease in 2.61 on the untreated side.

Excimer laser may also be used simultaneously with other therapies. In a large trial of 272 patients, Trott, et al. showed that treatment with PUVA followed by four treatments with the excimer laser rather than PUVA alone did not change efficacy, but patients went into remission in half the treatment time and with half the cumulative UVA dose.18 Another study evaluated the use of topical psoralen plus treatment with excimer laser. Ten patients completed the study. Three different concentrations of 8- methoxypsoralen (0.001%, 0.01%, and 0.1%) were applied prior to irradiation with 4 MEDs of targeted UVB phototherapy once weekly for 12 weeks.19 With area under the curve analysis, 0.1% 8-MOP/NB-UVB with excimer laser was superior to other modalities, including traditional topical paint PUVA, in reducing the psoriasis severity index in the patients tested. More recently, Dr. Klaus Fritz in Germany tested the combination of excimer laser with topical calcipotriol. 20 In this single center, open label trial, 36 patients received 308nm UVB to all target lesions with half the lesions also receiving calcipotriol ointment twice daily. Clearing of infiltration, erythema, and scales was achieved in 25 percent of patients after two sessions for the excimer laser-treated side without calcipotriol and 40 percent in the calcipotriol plus excimer-treated side. Calcipotriol treatment needed fewer sessions of excimer laser treatment, fewer days to achieve a reduction of the PASI parameter, and a lower cumulative dosage. No p-values were reported.

Although all earlier studies have focused on the use of excimer laser in more localized, mild to moderate psoriasis, advances in laser technology may allow the treatment of a larger surface area, that is, generalized, moderate to severe plaque type psoriasis. Gattu, et al., in a pilot, open-label trial, treated 13 patients with 10-30 percent body surface area twice weekly for 12 weeks and then followed these patients for six months following treatment completion.5 Of the 12 patients who completed the study, 54 percent of patients achieved PASI-75 at 12 weeks. However, in a retrospective analysis that eliminated two suboptimal patients (one who was morbidly obese and the other with skin type 1) 77 percent of patients achieved PASI-75. During the six month follow-up period 83 percent maintained PASI-50 with no treatment whatsoever. This study suggests that treatment with the excimer laser is becoming a viable therapeutic option even for patients with moderate to severe generalized psoriasis.

Overall, no serious adverse events were noted in the trials with the 308nm excimer laser for treatment of psoriasis (See Table 1). The treatments were usually well-tolerated with common side effects generally limited to erythema, blistering, hyperpigmentation, and peri-lesional edema secondary to a phototoxic reaction. Other less common side effects included mild irritation, moderate skin pain, and pruritis. Most of these side effects were transient and most commonly resolved within 12-24 hours of treatment. Severe burns causing extensive pain or disability were not reported in any of the trials.

Another major concern with NB-UVB phototherapy is the hypothetical risk of increased skin cancer. Although no long-term laser studies have been performed, with regards to UVB in general, an analysis by Lee, et al., reviewing 11 clinical trials with NB-UVB concluded that none of the published studies showed an increase in skin cancer risk with NB or BB-UVB phototherapy, except for one PUVA cohort (who were also exposed to UVB) analysis on genital cancer.21 Therefore, based on currently available data, even for fair-skinned Caucasians, no precise limit with regard to the number of allowable UVB treatments can be defined. This concern should be even less for darker skinned, non- Caucasians who are less prone to damage from UV rays. Overall, they suggest that UVB phototherapy remains a very safe therapeutic option for psoriasis. No specific studies have examined the risk of skin cancer in treatments with the excimer laser. However, unlike traditional UVB phototherapy, UVB irradiation using the excimer laser spares the non-involved skin and therefore, it is theoretically possible that the risk of skin cancer may be less with excimer laser UVB as compared to traditional UVB phototherapy.

Growing evidence supports the safety, efficacy, and speed of clearance associated with the 308nm excimer laser for the management of not only localized plaque psoriasis, but also generalized as well as inverse, palmoplantar, and scalp psoriasis. The laser has many advantages including lack of systemic toxicity, protection of non-affected skin, flexibility in dosing, ability to treat areas difficult to reach through conventional phototherapy, and convenience relative to traditional phototherapy, due to better efficacy, requiring fewer treatment sessions. Although further investigation is warranted, the excimer laser is likely to gain more widespread use as the technology becomes more powerful and treatment technique is further refined through exploration of combination, sequential, or rotational strategies in the future.

Dr. Bhutani has no relevant disclosures. Dr. Koo is a consultant for PhotoMedex.

  1. Koo J. Population-based epidemiologic study of psoriasis with emphasis on quality of life assessment. Dermatol Clinics. 1996;14(3):485-96.
  2. Hamzavi I, Kerr HA. Phototherapy and laser for the treatment of mild-to-moderate psoriasis. In: Koo JY, Lee CS, Lebwohl MG, editors. Mild-to-Moderate Psoriasis 2nd Edition ed. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2009. p. 103-128.
  3. Hong J, Malick F, Sivanesan P, Koo JY. Expanding use of the 308nm excimer laser for treatment of psoriasis. Practical Dermatology. 2007;Supplement(April 2007):13-16.
  4. Zakarian K, Nguyen A, Letsinger J, Koo J. Excimer laser for psoriasis: A review of theories regarding enhanced efficacy over traditional UVB phototherapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007;6(8):794-8.
  5. Gattu S, Pang ML, Pugashetti R, Malick F, Hong J, Bowers E, et al. Pilot evaluation of supra-erythemogenic phototherapy with excimer laser in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J Derm Treatment. 2010;21:54-60.
  6. Gattu S, Rashid RM, Wu JJ. 308-nm excimer laser in psoriasis vulgaris, scalp psoriasis, and palmoplantar psoriasis. JEADV. 2009;23:36-41.
  7. Bianchi B, Campoimi P, Mavillia L, Rossi R, Cappugi P. Monochromatic excimer light (308nm): An immunohistochemical study of cutaneous T cells and apoptosis-related molecules in psoriasis. JEADV. 2003;17:408-13.
  8. Bonis B, Kemeny L, Dobozy A, Bor Z, Szabo G, Ignacz F. 308nm UVB excimer laser for psoriasis. Lancet. 1997;350:1522.
  9. Goldinger SM, Dummer R, Schmid P, Vavricka MP, Burg G, Lauchli S. Excimer laser versus narrow-band UVB (311nm) in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris. Dermatology. 2006;213:134-9.
  10. Kollner K, Wimmershoff MB, Hintz C, Landthaler M, Hohenleutner U. Comparison of the 308-nm excimer laser and a 308-nm excimer lamp with 311-nm narrowband ultraviolet B in the treatment of psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2005;152:750-4.
  11. Asawonda P, Anderson RR, Chang Y, Taylor CR. 308-nm excimer laser for the treatment of psoriasis. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:619-24.
  12. Feldman SR, Mellen BG, Housman TS, Fitzpatrick RE, Geronemus RG, Friedman PM, et al. Efficacy of the 308-nm excimer laser for treatment of psoriasis: Results of a multicenter study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46(6):900-6.
  13. Taneja A, Trehan M, Taylor CR. 308-nm excimer laser for the treatment of psoriasis. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:759-64.
  14. Nistico SP, Saraceno R, Stefanescu S, Chimenti S. A 308-nm monochromatic excimer light in the treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis. JEADV. 2006;20:523-6.
  15. Han L, Somani AK, Huang Q, Fang X, Jin Y, Xiang LH, et al. Evaluation of 308-nm monochromatic excimer light in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris and palmoplantar psoriasis. Photodermatology Photoimmunology and Photomedicine. 2008;24:231-6.
  16. Morison WL, Atkinson DF, Werthman L. Effective treatment of scalp psoriasis using the excimer (308nm) laser. . 2006;22:181-3.
  17. Taylor CR, Racette AL. A 308-nm excimer laser for the treatment of scalp psoriasis. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34:136-40.
  18. Trott J, Wolfgang G, Hammes S, Ockenfels HM. The effectiveness of PUVA treatment in severe psoriasis is significantly increased by additional UV 308-nm excimer laser sessions. Eur J Dermatol. 2008;18(1):55-60.
  19. Asawonda P, Amornpinyokeit N, Nimnuan C. Topical 8-methoxypsoralen enhances the therapeutic results of targeted narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy for plaque type psoriasis. JEADV. 2008;22:50-55.
  20. Fritz K. 308-nm excimer laser phototherapy of psoriasis: Monotherapy versus combination with calcipotriol therapy. Medical Laser Application. 2008;23:87-92.
  21. Lee E, Koo J, Berger T. UVB phototherapy and skin cancer risk: A review of the literature. International Journal of Dermatology. 2005;44:355-60.